State Machine: Best way?
-
@Aidan-Oxley Why in the Scene Editor?
They have no use in the Scene Editor.
Why this extra round trip out to the Scene Editor to "create" something that's already been created?
What am I missing from understanding what these things are?
@Deeeds for predefined, create them in the scene editor, for dynamic creat them in the behavior.
-
@Aidan-Oxley Why in the Scene Editor?
They have no use in the Scene Editor.
Why this extra round trip out to the Scene Editor to "create" something that's already been created?
What am I missing from understanding what these things are?
@Deeeds said in State Machine: Best way?:
@Aidan-Oxley Why in the Scene Editor?
They have no use in the Scene Editor.
Why this extra round trip out to the Scene Editor to "create" something that's already been created?
What am I missing from understanding what these things are?
You do it in the scene editor because you're giving a specified object it's own attribute or property.
Think of it like how each object has it's own mass. You can adjust the mass right from the main editor with out having to use a behaviour. The attributes are designed so you can do this same quick change with any custom parameter you create.For example, say you create an attribute that defines the difficulty of an enemy. You can duplicate this enemy, and quickly change the difficulty with out going into the behaviours and changing anything there.
The ones you create inside the behaviour editor under "dynamic" are generated at runtime.
-
@Deeeds said in State Machine: Best way?:
@Aidan-Oxley Why in the Scene Editor?
They have no use in the Scene Editor.
Why this extra round trip out to the Scene Editor to "create" something that's already been created?
What am I missing from understanding what these things are?
You do it in the scene editor because you're giving a specified object it's own attribute or property.
Think of it like how each object has it's own mass. You can adjust the mass right from the main editor with out having to use a behaviour. The attributes are designed so you can do this same quick change with any custom parameter you create.For example, say you create an attribute that defines the difficulty of an enemy. You can duplicate this enemy, and quickly change the difficulty with out going into the behaviours and changing anything there.
The ones you create inside the behaviour editor under "dynamic" are generated at runtime.
@Murtaza Yes, I get the functionality, the purpose and their reasoning for existence.
What I don't understand is the limited design of their operability.
If I'm in the Behaviour Editor, where I must be to initially create and attach an attribute to an object, why can't I finish its creation and setting up, utterly, thoroughly and completely in the Behaviour Editor?
Why do I need to roundtrip out to the Scene Editor to complete the process? This is arbitrary restriction, and not necessary for ANY OTHER property, all of which can be adjusted inside the Behaviour Editor.
Take your Mass example, as an example.
I don't need to go out to the Scene Editor in order to access that property, I can do it in the Behaviour Editor with a Get and Set of the Mass.
I think the problem is the conflation of Set attribute with Create Attribute. For the sake of clarity, ease of use, separation of tasks and a sane workflow etc... perhaps there should be a "Create Attribute" behaviour and Set and Get.
-
@Murtaza Yes, I get the functionality, the purpose and their reasoning for existence.
What I don't understand is the limited design of their operability.
If I'm in the Behaviour Editor, where I must be to initially create and attach an attribute to an object, why can't I finish its creation and setting up, utterly, thoroughly and completely in the Behaviour Editor?
Why do I need to roundtrip out to the Scene Editor to complete the process? This is arbitrary restriction, and not necessary for ANY OTHER property, all of which can be adjusted inside the Behaviour Editor.
Take your Mass example, as an example.
I don't need to go out to the Scene Editor in order to access that property, I can do it in the Behaviour Editor with a Get and Set of the Mass.
I think the problem is the conflation of Set attribute with Create Attribute. For the sake of clarity, ease of use, separation of tasks and a sane workflow etc... perhaps there should be a "Create Attribute" behaviour and Set and Get.
@Deeeds If you use Set Attribute with a dynamic key and give it a name, when the behaviour is run and that key doesn’t exist yet it, will create a new attribute with that key. Predefined is just another option for games where you don’t want to dynamically add new keys, but you just want the key to be there from the start.
-
@Murtaza Yes, I get the functionality, the purpose and their reasoning for existence.
What I don't understand is the limited design of their operability.
If I'm in the Behaviour Editor, where I must be to initially create and attach an attribute to an object, why can't I finish its creation and setting up, utterly, thoroughly and completely in the Behaviour Editor?
Why do I need to roundtrip out to the Scene Editor to complete the process? This is arbitrary restriction, and not necessary for ANY OTHER property, all of which can be adjusted inside the Behaviour Editor.
Take your Mass example, as an example.
I don't need to go out to the Scene Editor in order to access that property, I can do it in the Behaviour Editor with a Get and Set of the Mass.
I think the problem is the conflation of Set attribute with Create Attribute. For the sake of clarity, ease of use, separation of tasks and a sane workflow etc... perhaps there should be a "Create Attribute" behaviour and Set and Get.
@Deeeds There is no problem. None.
Stop making stuff out of nothing.
-
@Deeeds There is no problem. None.
Stop making stuff out of nothing.
-
@GameCRAZY Run along.
@Deeeds Some of us have been here since day 1, and we have submitted less "problems" than you have in one week.
-
@Deeeds Some of us have been here since day 1, and we have submitted less "problems" than you have in one week.
@GameCRAZY If you're not going to help with my understanding of this problem, recognition of this as a problem or inconsistency or otherwise. Run along. Please.
You're not helping.
-
Guys lets keep this civil.
While we appreciate our passionate users trying to defend the app, we know it's not perfect.
We also really appreciate the passionate users who are willing to give their feedback and information.
We know hyperPad has tons of room for improvement. Somethings we couldn't do based on timing, or they rely on something else. Other features we decided not to include on purpose. But in the end when users give their feedback it really helps us prioritize, and helps us find things we missed.We're all here for the same reasons, and we all (hopefully) want hyperPad to be awesome. :).
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login