Weird!
-
I found that if you take two empty object squares, and have the first at a 45 degree angle, with the second directly on top of it, the second won’t balance on the corner of the first.....but if you set the first’s angle to 44.999985 it will balance. Every time you come back to the angle setting it has been rounded to 45, but if you set it to 45 then, it stops balancing.
-
I found that if you take two empty object squares, and have the first at a 45 degree angle, with the second directly on top of it, the second won’t balance on the corner of the first.....but if you set the first’s angle to 44.999985 it will balance. Every time you come back to the angle setting it has been rounded to 45, but if you set it to 45 then, it stops balancing.
I'm curious as to how you found this number.
-
I'm curious as to how you found this number.
@Deeeds I’m gonna guess trial and error, based off which way the square falls over.
-
I'm curious as to how you found this number.
@Deeeds, @Aidan-Oxley is right...trial and error. It was fun LOL!
-
@Deeeds, @Aidan-Oxley is right...trial and error. It was fun LOL!
@iTap-Development Two exactly round balls, one on the ground, one above it, falling down on it, and then bouncing up.
What's the offset required to ensure the ball falling down never bounces to the side, always going straight up and down?
-
@iTap-Development Two exactly round balls, one on the ground, one above it, falling down on it, and then bouncing up.
What's the offset required to ensure the ball falling down never bounces to the side, always going straight up and down?
@Deeeds for me it's 0. Having the exact same x coordinate works, unless it falls off after a really long time. Is it different for you?
-
@Deeeds for me it's 0. Having the exact same x coordinate works, unless it falls off after a really long time. Is it different for you?
-
@Jack8680 Yeah, I'm getting immediate movement to the side. The upper ball bounces off to the right, by the third fall it's off the below ball and away...... free... dom....
Weird!
I have no idea what would cause these kinds of bugs other than some weird rounding error in the bouncing or collision maths.
-
Weird!
I have no idea what would cause these kinds of bugs other than some weird rounding error in the bouncing or collision maths.
-
@iTap-Development Two exactly round balls, one on the ground, one above it, falling down on it, and then bouncing up.
What's the offset required to ensure the ball falling down never bounces to the side, always going straight up and down?
@Deeeds 0 offset works for me too.
-
Did anyone have the same result with the squares?
-
Did anyone have the same result with the squares?
@iTap-Development When I had either a square flat and the other at 45° (or your weird angle), the square always fell down. But I had the square falling onto the other (a wall object).
-
@iTap-Development When I had either a square flat and the other at 45° (or your weird angle), the square always fell down. But I had the square falling onto the other (a wall object).
@Aidan-Oxley my 45 (or 44.999985) was a wall and the 0° fell onto it.
Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.
Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.
With your input, this post could be even better 💗
Register Login