Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • Users
  • Search
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
hyperPad

hyperPad Forum

  1. Home
  2. Help and Support
  3. Find the Collision Point: HOW?

Find the Collision Point: HOW?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Help and Support
26 Posts 5 Posters 2.9k Views 4 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Deeeds

    @iTap-Development I don't understand what you're saying. World Units are the useful ones, I thought. Given that, I can move an object to that point and do something with it.

    Without the edge information and absolute coordinates on that edge (of an object) relative information is of little to no use. That I can think of. Polygon shapes in hyperPad have too many problems anyways... no way to snap lines to angles, etc.

    Aidan_FireA Offline
    Aidan_FireA Offline
    Aidan_Fire
    wrote on last edited by Aidan_Fire
    #21

    @Deeeds For the long rectangle: Collided with object → spawn particle object (anywhere) + broadcast two messages, one with x value one with y value of the Collided output.

    For the particle object: Receive broadcast messages → move to coordinates given → start particles → destroy object.

    I wouldn’t even try to use a custom anchor lol.

    Jack de WildeJ 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Aidan_FireA Aidan_Fire

      @Deeeds For the long rectangle: Collided with object → spawn particle object (anywhere) + broadcast two messages, one with x value one with y value of the Collided output.

      For the particle object: Receive broadcast messages → move to coordinates given → start particles → destroy object.

      I wouldn’t even try to use a custom anchor lol.

      Jack de WildeJ Offline
      Jack de WildeJ Offline
      Jack de Wilde
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      @Aidan-Oxley why use broadcast/receive? Can't you just spawn the particle directly at the point with spawn on area?

      Aidan_FireA 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Jack de WildeJ Jack de Wilde

        @Aidan-Oxley why use broadcast/receive? Can't you just spawn the particle directly at the point with spawn on area?

        Aidan_FireA Offline
        Aidan_FireA Offline
        Aidan_Fire
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        @Jack8680 Yep. Heaps better idea.

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Aidan_FireA Aidan_Fire

          @Jack8680 Yep. Heaps better idea.

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Deeeds
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          @Aidan-Oxley Is this really the best way to create a particle system at a collision point?

          CC @Jack8680

          Jack de WildeJ 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Deeeds

            @Aidan-Oxley Is this really the best way to create a particle system at a collision point?

            CC @Jack8680

            Jack de WildeJ Offline
            Jack de WildeJ Offline
            Jack de Wilde
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            @Deeeds using spawn on area for a particle object at x and y of the collision points is the simplest to do I think. Converting the collision to an anchor and using the start particles behaviour at that anchor is probably more efficient since there's no spawning involved, but converting the anchors is annoying.

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • Jack de WildeJ Jack de Wilde

              @Deeeds using spawn on area for a particle object at x and y of the collision points is the simplest to do I think. Converting the collision to an anchor and using the start particles behaviour at that anchor is probably more efficient since there's no spawning involved, but converting the anchors is annoying.

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Thecheater887
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              @Jack8680 spawn a particle object and use destroy object attached to play particles.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0

              Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

              Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

              With your input, this post could be even better 💗

              Register Login
              Reply
              • Reply as topic
              Log in to reply
              • Oldest to Newest
              • Newest to Oldest
              • Most Votes


              • Login

              • Login or register to search.
              • First post
                Last post
              0
              • Categories
              • Recent
              • Tags
              • Popular
              • Users
              • Search